Skip to main content

ANATOMY OF MELANCHOLIA

Buy Article:

$63.00 + tax (Refund Policy)

This article analyses some of the aesthetic and philosophical strands of Lars von Trier's MELANCHOLIA, focusing in particular on the film's remarkable Prelude, arguing that it performs a complex ethical critique of rationalist optimism in the guise of a neo-italictic allegory of world-destruction. At the same time, I suggest that MELANCHOLIA seeks to “work through” the loss of worlds – cinematic but also cultural and natural – that characterises our historical mood, one that might be described as a deflationary apocalypticism or melancholy modernity. From this perspective, MELANCHOLIA belongs to a genealogical lineage that links it with two earlier films important for von Trier: Ingmar Bergman's Shame [Skammen] (1968) and Andrei Tarkovsky's The Sacrifice (1986). All three films share a concern with apocalypticism, world-sacrifice, and historical melancholia; but they also explore different responses to the imagined experience of a catastrophic loss of world. By examining these films in relation to MELANCHOLIA we can trace the logic of this loss, culminating in MELANCHOLIA's radical gesture of world-sacrifice; this aestheticisation of world-destruction has the paradoxical ethical meaning, I suggest, of preparing for a post-humanist beginning.

Keywords: Bergman; Tarkovsky; film-philosophy; melancholia; modernity; sacrifice; von Trier

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Department of Philosophy, Level 7, W6A Building, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Sydney, Australia

Publication date: 02 October 2014

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content