Mapping Spaces of Environmental Dispute: GIS, Mining, and Surveillance in the Amazon

Authors: Spiegel, Samuel J.1; Ribeiro, Carlos A. A. S.2; Sousa, Rodolfo3; Veiga, Marcello M.4

Source: Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Volume 102, Number 2, 1 March 2012 , pp. 320-349(30)

Publisher: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Recent scholarship has urged increased attention to how advances in geographical information systems (GIS) technology can more equitably help to bridge gaps between the theory and practice of environmental protection and dispute resolution. This study brings new evidence to burgeoning debates in the Amazon, examining how a United Nations (UN) development initiative developed mapping systems in a shifting political climate for environmental governance while conducting campaigns with peasant miners to address environmental management. Amendments made in 2002 to the Brazilian Forest Code established natural preserves according to the geographic features of watersheds. The laws deter commercial land use on preserves, imposing strict penalties where artisanal mining is widely prevalent as a livelihood. The UN program utilized GIS and Shuttle Radar imagery to map the contested areas according to legal definitions and engaged stakeholders to discuss political implications. In 2006, new reforms made such mapping tools even more controversial—and urgent—with amendments that created opportunities for bringing “informal” mining into the legal sphere, theoretically allowing “spaces of exception” where mining can be legitimated. Our multimethod study underscores the need for appreciating diverse understandings of ecologically sensitive zones and empowering rural communities to take ownership over geospatial technologies in addressing environmental challenges. Although maps produced using the proposed methods could be useful, dominant advocacies that champion GIS as an enforcement tool often undermine local trust, inflame tensions, and render alternative “grassroots GIS” strategies impracticable. We examine the contexts, powers, limitations, and risks of the UN's technical intervention, exploring how competing views of environmental controversy lead to divergent perspectives on the politics of GIS “knowledge translation” and mapping itself.

Keywords: Amazonia Brasileña; Brazilian Amazon; GIS; SIG crítico; cartografía criminal; crime mapping; critical GIS; ecología política; environmental monitoring; geospatial technologies; minería de pequeña escala; monitoreo ambiental; political ecology; small-scale mining; tecnologías geoespaciales

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2011.641861

Affiliations: 1: School of Social and Political Science,University of Edinburgh, 2: Department of Forest Engineering,Federal University of Viçosa, 3: Department of Forest Engineering,Federal University of Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valleys, 4: Norman B. Keevil Institute of Mining Engineering,University of British Columbia,

Publication date: March 1, 2012

Related content

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page