ISSN 0004-8402 (Print); ISSN 1471-6828 (Online)
Publisher: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group
The idea of a solid
“Ought” from “Is” 1 I am grateful for criticisms of an earlier version from Mr. R. M. Hare (who kindly showed me a paper of his own on the earlier part of Searle's specimen argument), Dr. A. Sloman, Mr. R. G. Swinburne, Professor A. R. White and Mr. C. J. F. Williams.
Knowledge and moral belief
On the “Commonness” of the common sensibles
Performative utterances and the concept of contract
Rule-utilitarianism: Merely an illusory alternative?
Utilitarianism and rules
The universalisability of lying