Skip to main content

Why Physicians Ought to Lie for Their Patients

Buy Article:

$65.53 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Sometimes physicians lie to third-party payers in order to grant their patients treatment they would otherwise not receive. This strategy, commonly known as gaming the system, is generally condemned for three reasons. First, it may hurt the patient for the sake of whom gaming was intended. Second, it may hurt other patients. Third, it offends contractual and distributive justice. Hence, gaming is considered to be immoral behavior. This article is an attempt to show that, on the contrary, gaming may sometimes be a physician's duty. Under specific circumstances, gaming may be necessary from the viewpoint of the internal morality of medicine. Moreover, the objections against gaming are examples of what we call the idealistic fallacy, that is, the fallacy of passing judgments in a nonideal world according to ideal standards. Hence, the objections are inconclusive. Gaming is sometimes justified, and may even be required in the name of beneficence.

Keywords: organizational ethics; philosophy; professional ethics; professional–patient relationship; rationing/resource allocation; right to health care

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2011.652797

Affiliations: Institute for Biomedical Ethics, Geneva University Medical School,

Publication date: March 1, 2012

More about this publication?
routledg/ajob/2012/00000012/00000003/art00002
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more