Intuition and annotation - the discussion continues
Author: Sinclair, John
Source: Language and Computers, Advances in Corpus Linguistics. Papers from the 23rd International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 23) Göteborg 22-26 May 2002. Edited by Karin Aijmer and Bengt Altenberg , pp. 39-59(21)
Publisher: Rodopi
Abstract:
Some corpus linguists prefer to research using plain text, while others first prepare the texts by adding various analytic annotations. The former group express reservations about the reliability of intuitive "data", whereas the latter group, if obliged to choose, will reject corpus evidence in favour of their intuitive responses. This paper attempts to move from the broad differences expressed above to a small number of specific points of contrast between the two approaches.Document Type: Research article
Publication date: 2004-04-01
- Subscribe to this Title
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
- In this: publication
- By this: publisher
- In this Subject: Computer Science , Language & Linguistics
- By this author: Sinclair, John

Shopping cart
Receive new issue alert
Get Permissions