Two Dogmas of Empiricism. Fifty Years After
Author: Schnädelbach, Herbert
Source: Grazer Philosophische Studien, Fifty Years of Quine's Two Dogmas. Edited by Hans-Johann Glock, Kathrin Glür, and Geert Keil , pp. 7-12(6)
Abstract:Quine's "Two Dogmas of Empiricism", a short paper which appeared 50 years ago in the Philosophical Review, was a milestone within the development of analytic philosophy. It was more important than many big volumes before and after. This might strike someone not familiar with the analytic tradition as a bit unusual; such impact one might expect from whole books like the Critique of Pure Reason or the Tractatus, but not from a 16 page paper. In these remarks, which opened a conference on Quine's seminal paper, I would like to indicate why "Two Dogmas" was and still is so important, not only as a standard topic of modern philosophical teaching and as a provocative treatment of the evergreen problem of analyticity, but also as one of the most challenging answers to the question what role philosophy can play in an age of science.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 1 July 2003