Use of interval based quality indicators in blood pressure management to enhance quality of pay for performance incentives: comparison to two indicators from the Quality and Outcomes Framework

Authors: Mabotuwana, Thusitha1; Warren, Jim2; Elley, C Raina3; Kennelly, John3; Paton, Chris4; Warren, Debra4; Chang Wai, Kuinileti3; Wells, Stewart4

Source: Quality in Primary Care, Volume 18, Number 2, April 2010 , pp. 93-101(9)

Publisher: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd.

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $20.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Background: Pay for performance incentives are becoming increasingly popular, but are typically based on only a single point-in-time measurement as an indicator of chronic condition management.

Aims: To determine the association between three time-interval based indicators of suboptimal blood pressure (BP) control and two point-in-time indicators from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF): BP5 (the percentage of patients with hypertension in whom the last BP in the previous nine months was ≤150/90) and DM12 (the percentage of patients with diabetes in whom the last BP in the previous 15 months was ≤145/85).

Methods: We extracted classification data and BP measurements from four New Zealand general practices with 4260 to 6130 enrolled patients. Data were analysed for three indicators with respect to a nine-month evaluation period for patients with hypertension and a 15-month period for patients with diabetes: (1) two or more consistently high BP measurements spaced over ≥90 days, (2) a high BP measurement followed by a lapse of >120 days in BP measurement and (3) no BP measurement for >180 days.

Results: For the four practices, 65-81% of the patients satisfied BP5 and 59-68% of patients satisfied DM12. Of the hypertension patients satisfying BP5, 31% (95% CI: 28-33%) failed at least one of the three interval based indicators; 42% (95% CI: 39-46%) of the diabetes patients satisfying DM12 failed at least one of the three interval based indicators.

Conclusion: Considering only a point-in-time controlled BP measurement provides an incomplete view of the quality of BP management in patients with hypertension or diabetes over a period of time.

Keywords: CLINICAL AUDIT; LONG-TERM CARE; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QOF; QUALITY INDICATORS

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: Department of Computer Science - Tamaki Campus and National Institute for Health Innovation/Section for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 2: Chair in Health Informatics, Department of Computer Science - Tamaki Campus and National Institute for Health Innovation/Section for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 3: Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 4: National Institute for Health Innovation/Section for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Publication date: 2010-04-01

More about this publication?

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page