Use of interval based quality indicators in blood pressure management to enhance quality of pay for performance incentives: comparison to two indicators from the Quality and Outcomes Framework
Authors: Mabotuwana, Thusitha1; Warren, Jim2; Elley, C Raina3; Kennelly, John3; Paton, Chris4; Warren, Debra4; Chang Wai, Kuinileti3; Wells, Stewart4
Source: Quality in Primary Care, Volume 18, Number 2, April 2010 , pp. 93-101(9)
Publisher: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd.
Abstract:
Background: Pay for performance incentives are becoming increasingly popular, but are typically based on only a single point-in-time measurement as an indicator of chronic condition management.Aims: To determine the association between three time-interval based indicators of suboptimal blood pressure (BP) control and two point-in-time indicators from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF): BP5 (the percentage of patients with hypertension in whom the last BP in the previous nine months was ≤150/90) and DM12 (the percentage of patients with diabetes in whom the last BP in the previous 15 months was ≤145/85).Methods: We extracted classification data and BP measurements from four New Zealand general practices with 4260 to 6130 enrolled patients. Data were analysed for three indicators with respect to a nine-month evaluation period for patients with hypertension and a 15-month period for patients with diabetes: (1) two or more consistently high BP measurements spaced over ≥90 days, (2) a high BP measurement followed by a lapse of >120 days in BP measurement and (3) no BP measurement for >180 days.Results: For the four practices, 65-81% of the patients satisfied BP5 and 59-68% of patients satisfied DM12. Of the hypertension patients satisfying BP5, 31% (95% CI: 28-33%) failed at least one of the three interval based indicators; 42% (95% CI: 39-46%) of the diabetes patients satisfying DM12 failed at least one of the three interval based indicators.Conclusion: Considering only a point-in-time controlled BP measurement provides an incomplete view of the quality of BP management in patients with hypertension or diabetes over a period of time.Keywords: CLINICAL AUDIT; LONG-TERM CARE; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QOF; QUALITY INDICATORS
Document Type: Research article
Affiliations: 1: Department of Computer Science - Tamaki Campus and National Institute for Health Innovation/Section for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 2: Chair in Health Informatics, Department of Computer Science - Tamaki Campus and National Institute for Health Innovation/Section for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 3: Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 4: National Institute for Health Innovation/Section for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Publication date: 2010-04-01
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
- In this: publication
- By this: publisher
- In this Subject: Medicine (General) , Public Health
- By this author: Mabotuwana, Thusitha ; Warren, Jim ; Elley, C Raina ; Kennelly, John ; Paton, Chris ; Warren, Debra ; Chang Wai, Kuinileti ; Wells, Stewart

Shopping cart
Receive new issue alert
Get Permissions