Refugees' perspectives on barriers to communication about trauma histories in primary care
Source: Mental Health in Family Medicine, Volume 9, Number 1, March 2012 , pp. 47-55(9)
Publisher: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd.
Abstract:Objective: This study explores refugees' perspectives regarding the nature of communication barriers that impede the exploration of trauma histories in primary care.
Method: Brief interviews were conducted with 53 refugee patients in a suburban primary care clinic in the Midwest USA. Participants were asked if they or their doctors had initiated conversations about the impact of political conflict in their home countries. Qualitative data analysis was guided by grounded theory. Peer debriefings of refugee healthcare professionals were incorporated into the analysis.
Results: Two-thirds of refugee patients reported that they never shared how they were affected by political conflict with their doctors and that their doctors never asked them about it. Most refugees stated that they would like to learn more about the impact of trauma on their health and to discuss their experiences with their doctors.
Conclusion: Refugees are hesitant to initiate conversations with physicians due to cultural norms requiring deference to the doctor's authority. They also lack knowledge about how trauma affects health. Physicians should be educated to inquire directly about trauma histories with refugee patients. Refugees can benefit from education about the effects of trauma on health and about the collaborative nature of the doctor–patient relationship.
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: 1: Research Associate, Center for Victims of Torture, Minneapolis, USA and School of Social Work, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, USA 2: Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, USA 3: Center for Victims of Torture, St Paul, MN, USA
Publication date: 2012-03-01