Authors: Freeman T.¹; Latham L.¹; Walshe K.²; Wallace L.³; Spurgeon P.⁴

Source: The Journal of Clinical Governance, Volume 9, Number 1, 1 March 2001 , pp. 33-39(7)

Publisher: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd.

Abstract:

Background Clinical governance places a new statutory responsibility on NHS organisations to put in place a framework for quality improvement, in which high standards are safeguarded, continuous improvement promoted and excellence encouraged. This definition contains elements of both assurance and continuous improvement approaches to quality, and poses a challenge to organisations in measuring progress. Objective To examine how directors of NHS trusts with a lead role in clinical governance intend to measure progress. Method Semi-structured face-to-face interviews with up to four directors from all 47 trusts in the West Midlands region, as part of a larger study. Of 151 interviews, 134 contained material related to how the progress of clinical governance might or would be measured in the organisation. This paper presents an analysis of those components of the interview data. Results Areas identified as potential indicators include the adoption and use of care protocols, integration with business planning, the operation and integration of structures and processes, clinical outcomes, reflective practice, learning from mistakes and openness. Measurement intentions reveal differences between those who see clinical governance as a performance management and assurance system, and those who view it more as a vehicle for promoting continuous quality improvement. In total, 86 (64%) interviewees described their measurement intentions solely in terms of quality assurance. Discussion Where trusts measure progress in clinical governance exclusively in terms of quality assurance, they will have little indication of progress in continuous quality improvement. An extensive literature on assurance-based performance indicator systems provides cautionary reading against exclusive reliance on such systems. Conclusion Those responsible for implementing clinical governance need to ensure that arrangements are in place to gather and use information on both assurance and improvement elements.

Keywords: CLINICAL GOVERNANCE; CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY ASSURANCE

Language: English

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: Research Fellow, Health Services Management Centre, Birmingham University 2: Senior Research Fellow, Health Services Management Centre, Birmingham University 3: Professor in Psychology and Health, University of Coventry 4: Professor of Health Service Management, Health Services Management Centre, Birmingham University

Publication date: 2001-03-01

More about this publication?

• Editorial Board
• Information for Authors
• Subscribe to this Title
• ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Political Science
• By this author: Freeman T. ;  Latham L. ;  Walshe K. ;  Wallace L. ;  Spurgeon P.

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers