Authors: Bryan, Cathy¹; Boren, Suzanne Austin²

Source: Informatics in Primary Care, Volume 16, Number 2, July 2008 , pp. 79-91(13)

Publisher: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd.

Abstract:

Background: The 1999 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report To Err is Human alerted the healthcare industry and the public to the lack of consistency in the delivery of quality care to the US population. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have become a leading response to this report, and to the growing demand for the promotion of standards-based care delivery. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the recent literature for both the types and effectiveness of electronic CDSS in the primary care setting.

Methods: An electronic search of the literature was conducted utilising MEDLINE (1996-2006), CINAHL (1982-2006) and all EBM Reviews - Cochrane DSR, ACP Journal Club, DARE and CCTR. The search included various combinations of the MeSH search terms 'clinical decision support systems', 'primary health care', 'ambulatory care' and 'practice guidelines' and was limited to articles published from 2000 to 2006. Studies were selected for review if they involved either non-randomised observational or randomised controlled trials (RCTs) utilising CDSS as a single intervention, were performed in an ambulatory primary care setting and included quantifiable outcome measures.

Results: Seventeen studies were included in the review, including five non-randomised observational studies and 12 RCTs. Thirteen studies (76%) found either positive or variable outcomes related to CDSS intervention with four studies (24%) showing no significant effect.

Conclusion: Although there is validation that CDSS has the potential to produce statistically significant improvement in outcomes, there is much variability among the types and methods of CDSS implementation and resulting effectiveness. As CDSS will likely continue to be at the forefront of the march toward effective standards-based care, more work needs to be done to determine effective implementation strategies for the use of CDSS across multiple settings and patient populations.

References: 31 references open in new window

Articles that cite this article?

Keywords: AMBULATORY CARE; CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: Department of Health Management and Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA; Chief Clinical Officer, CINA Inc 2: Assistant Professor of Health Informatics, Department of Health Management and Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO; Health Services Research and Development Program, Harry S Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Co

Publication date: 2008-07-01

More about this publication?

• Editorial Board
• Information for Authors
• Subscribe to this Title
• ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Medical Informatics
• By this author: Bryan, Cathy ;  Boren, Suzanne Austin

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers