If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

Bystander Exposure: Does the current regulatory approach provide adequate protection?

$47.81 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Buy Article:

Abstract:

In September 2005, the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (RCEP) published a report, which among other things, recommended the introduction of a compulsory 5-metre buffer zone next to residential properties to provide added protection against possible health risks from spray drift (Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, 2005). In contrast, the Advisory Committee on Pesticides (ACP) has advised that a buffer zone of this sort would be a disproportionate response to scientific uncertainty, although it might be justifiable simply on the grounds that many people do not like pesticides being sprayed right up to their boundaries (Advisory Committee on Pesticides, 2005). This paper summarises the methods that currently are used to assess health risks to neighbours and other bystanders, and examines why two eminent and independent committees have come to differing conclusions on the need for added precaution.

Keywords: BYSTANDER; EXPOSURE; PESTICIDES; REGULATION; RISK; TOXICITY; UNCERTAINTY

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: April 1, 2006

More about this publication?
Related content

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more