Factors and perceptions that influence women's decisions to have a single embryo transferred

Authors: de Lacey, S.1; Davies, M.1; Homan, G.2; Briggs, N.3; Norman, R.J.2

Source: Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Volume 15, Number 5, November 2007 , pp. 526-531(6)

Publisher: Reproductive Healthcare Ltd

Purchase options

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$36.48 plus tax      Refund Policy

OR

 
More about this publication?
More like this?
Content Key:
Free Content - Free
New Content - New
Open Access Content - Open Access
Subscribed Content - Subscribed
Free Trial Content - Free Trial

Abstract:

The aim of this study was to identify factors that inhibit or promote the adoption of single embryo transfer (SET). A cohort of 163 women patients receiving IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment, comprising 87 women choosing SET and 63 women choosing double embryo transfer (DET), were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. The data were compared using logistic regression analysis. Confidence in the chance of pregnancy with SET, younger age and first treatment were predictive of a decision for SET. Preference for a healthy and singleton pregnancy was predictive but perceptions of the incidence or risk of multiple gestation were not. Factors such as a sense of time urgency and past experience of treatment were significant and predictive of diminished choice of SET. The clinic doctor was an important influencing factor. The results of this study confirm that improved pregnancy rates in SET coupled with an official clinic policy to promote SET in younger, first cycle patients influenced many women to choose SET. However, repeated treatment, advancing age and urgency to become pregnant are factors that moderate a woman's choice for SET.

Keywords: DECISION-MAKING; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; PATIENT COUNSELLING; SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Research Centre for Reproductive Health, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, South Australia 2: Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Research Centre for Reproductive Health, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, South Australia; Repromed, Dulwich, South Australia 3: Discipline of Public Health, Data Management and Analysis Centre, University of Adelaide

Back to top

Content Key:
Free Content - Free
New Content - New
Open Access Content - Open Access
Subscribed Content - Subscribed
Free Trial Content - Free Trial
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in
Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A