Authors: Tamhankar, A.P.¹; Mazari, F.A.K.²; Everitt, N.J.³; Ravi, K.³

Source: Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, Volume 91, Number 6, September 2009 , pp. 460-463(4)

Publisher: The Royal College of Surgeons of England

Abstract:

INTRODUCTION: Patient-directed information available on the internet is not always regulated; it may be confusing and sometimes just overwhelming. We aimed to establish the proportion of patients undergoing two common surgical procedures, who searched the internet for information about their operations and to assess the usefulness of the information they received.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 105 consecutive patients undergoing elective abdominal wall hernia repair (n = 54) or laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 51) in a single surgical firm were included in the study. Patients were counselled about their operation in pre-operative assessment clinics and standard trust information leaflets were provided without any mention of this study. Patients were then asked to complete a questionnaire on the morning of their operation.

RESULTS: All patients completed the questionnaire. Of the patients, 59% stated that they had access to the internet and 77% of these accessed the internet over 2 h a week. Of the patients with internet access, 31% used it to acquire additional information about their operations and 58% used internet search engines. Of the patients who searched the internet regarding their operations, 26% were confused and/or worried by the information they received.

CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients undergoing common surgical procedures used the internet and about one-third of them specifically sought information about their operation on the internet. Such information can cause worry and confusion in patients. Our study highlights the need for regulated, comprehensible, patient information on hospital websites to which patients should be directed.

References: 12 references open in new window

Articles that cite this article?

Keywords: INTERNET; HERNIA; CHOLECYSTECTOMY

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588409X432121

Affiliations: 1: Department of General Surgery, Doncaster Royal Infirmary, Armthorpe Road, Doncaster DN2 5LT, UK., Email: aptamhankar@hotmail.com 2: Academic Vascular Surgery Unit, Hull Royal Hospital, Hull, UK 3: Department of Surgery, Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Chesterfield, UK

Publication date: 2009-09-01

More about this publication?

• The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official journal of the College and is published eight times a year in January, March, April, May, July, September, October and November. The main aim of the journal is to publish high quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery.
  
  The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, NICE news, controversial topics, CORESS feedback, book reviews and the best trainee presentations from England and Wales. The editorial board is composed of members of the College Council and experts from across the surgical specialties.
  
  Archive issues of the Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are available via the PubMed Central database
  
  To view articles that have been published online ahead of print please click here
• Information for Authors
• Subscribe to this Title
• Information for Advertisers
• The journals of importance to UK clinicians - Survey
• ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Medicine ,  Surgery ,  Education
• By this author: Tamhankar, A.P. ;  Mazari, F.A.K. ;  Everitt, N.J. ;  Ravi, K.

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers