Free Content Comfort assessment of personal protection systems during total joint arthroplasty using a novel multi-dimensional evaluation tool

Authors: Malik, M.H.A.; Handford, Elizabeth; Staniford, Elaine; Gambhir, A.K.; Kay, P.R.

Source: Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, Volume 88, Number 5, September 2006 , pp. 465-469(5)

Publisher: The Royal College of Surgeons of England

Buy & download fulltext article:

Free content The full text is free.

View now:
PDF 460kb 

Abstract:

INTRODUCTION: A number of studies have assessed the usefulness of surgical gowns and exhaust suits with regards to barrier function and protection afforded to healthcare workers from blood strike-through, splashes and aerosols.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have performed a comfort assessment comparison between the Charnley exhaust suit, disposable gown plus visor and the Stryker Steri-Shield system using a newly developed objective multidimensional ergonomic tool designed to measure wearable comfort across the dimensions of emotion, attachment, harm, perceived change, movement and anxiety.

RESULTS: The total mean Comfort Rating Scale value for a disposable gown plus visor was 16.1 with a mean dimensional score of 2.7 (range, 0.2-8.4), for the Charnley system the values were 51.4 and 8.6 (range, 5.9-12.8), respectively, and for the Stryker Steri-Shield 15.4 and 2.6 (range, 0.8-5.6).

CONCLUSIONS: The Steri-Shield system provides the least variation in comfort and, as such, may offer the best combination of comfort, protective qualities and form or style of personal protection equipment for lower limb arthroplasty operations.

Keywords: COMFORT; TOTAL JOINT REPLACEMENT; PERSONAL PROTECTION SYSTEM

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588406X114695

Affiliations: 1: The Centre for Hip Surgery, Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, UK

Publication date: 2006-09-01

More about this publication?
  • The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official journal of the College and is published eight times a year in January, March, April, May, July, September, October and November. The main aim of the journal is to publish high quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery.

    The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, NICE news, controversial topics, CORESS feedback, book reviews and the best trainee presentations from England and Wales. The editorial board is composed of members of the College Council and experts from across the surgical specialties.

    Archive issues of the Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are available via the PubMed Central database

    To view articles that have been published online ahead of print please click here
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Information for Advertisers
  • The journals of importance to UK clinicians - Survey
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page