Free Content The changing practice of transurethral prostatectomy: a comparison of cases performed in 1990 and 2000

Authors: Wilson, J.R.; Urwin, G.H.; Stower, M.J.

Source: Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, Volume 86, Number 6, November 2004 , pp. 428-431(4)

Publisher: The Royal College of Surgeons of England

Buy & download fulltext article:

Free content The full text is free.

View now:
PDF 57.3kb 

Abstract:

Objectives : Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is considered by many to be the 'gold standard' treatment for benign prostatic enlargement. However, with the relatively recent introduction of pharmacological and other surgical treatment modalities, the performance of TURP appears to be in decline.

Methods : A retrospective casenote analysis of 200 patients who underwent TURP in 1990 and the year 2000 with the aim of identifying changes in the incidence and practice of TURP.

Results : There was a decline in the number of TURPs performed of 31.6% over the 10-year period, with more being carried out because of urinary retention. In 2000, the patient was older and the operative procedure took statistically longer than 10-years earlier, but the weight of prostate tissue resected, patient satisfaction and complication rates were similar.

Conclusions : At present, TURP is in decline, with urinary retention being the commonest indication. The population at present is older but this does not carry additional co-morbidity. The weight of resection has not altered, although surgery currently takes longer to perform.

Keywords: TURP; PRACTICE; INDICATION; DECLINE

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/147870804731

Affiliations: 1: Department of Urology, York Hospital, York, UK

Publication date: 2004-11-01

More about this publication?
  • The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official journal of the College and is published eight times a year in January, March, April, May, July, September, October and November. The main aim of the journal is to publish high quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery.

    The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, NICE news, controversial topics, CORESS feedback, book reviews and the best trainee presentations from England and Wales. The editorial board is composed of members of the College Council and experts from across the surgical specialties.

    Archive issues of the Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are available via the PubMed Central database

    To view articles that have been published online ahead of print please click here
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Information for Advertisers
  • The journals of importance to UK clinicians - Survey
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page