Authors: Cosgrove C.M.¹; Thornberry D.J.²; Wilkins D.C.¹; Ashley S.¹

Source: Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, Volume 84, Number 5, September 2002 , pp. 344-347(4)

Publisher: The Royal College of Surgeons of England

Abstract:

Aim: Only half of those patients undergoing major lower limb amputations for peripheral vascular disease (PVD) are likely to mobilise on a prosthesis. This study aimed to determine whether a surgeon's experience influenced the quality of the residual limb and thus the likelihood of the stump being suitable for a prosthesis.

Methods: All patients undergoing major lower limb amputations for PVD were recruited prospectively, between August 1992 and July 1996. Following surgery, patients were categorised, by a consultant in rehabilitation medicine, as potentially suitable (group 1) or unsuitable (group II) for rehabilitation. Patients in group I were further assessed by prosthetists for limb fitting.

Results: A total of 217 patients underwent 260 amputations for PVD between 1992 and 1996: trans-femoral (TFA) 131, trans-tibial (TTA) 127, and through-knee (TKA) in 2. The 30-day mortality was 12% (n = 27). Following surgery, 109 patients were assigned to group I (51%), and 81 patients to group II (37%). The proportion of junior surgeons performing surgery was similar for patients in both groups. Twenty-three amputation stumps (9%) required revision or conversion to a higher level within 30 days. Revisions or conversions were significantly more frequent where the original operation had been performed by an unsupervised junior surgeon rather than a senior surgeon (P = 0.009). The rate of defective amputations compromising limb fitting also reached significance when unsupervised junior and senior surgeons were compared (P = 0.04).

Conclusions: Rehabilitation of the relatively few amputees who reach the stage of limb fitting is hindered by poor surgical technique in a large proportion of cases. Patients operated on by a more experienced surgeon had a better chance of mobilising without revision or conversion surgery.

References: 10 references open in new window

Articles that cite this article?

Keywords: AMPUTATION; SUPERVISION; QUALITY

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: Vascular Surgical Unit, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK 2: Disablement Services Centre, Plymouth, UK

Publication date: 2002-09-01

More about this publication?

• The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official journal of the College and is published eight times a year in January, March, April, May, July, September, October and November. The main aim of the journal is to publish high quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery.
  
  The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, NICE news, controversial topics, CORESS feedback, book reviews and the best trainee presentations from England and Wales. The editorial board is composed of members of the College Council and experts from across the surgical specialties.
  
  Archive issues of the Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are available via the PubMed Central database
  
  To view articles that have been published online ahead of print please click here
• Information for Authors
• Subscribe to this Title
• Information for Advertisers
• The journals of importance to UK clinicians - Survey
• ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Medicine ,  Surgery ,  Education
• By this author: Cosgrove C.M. ;  Thornberry D.J. ;  Wilkins D.C. ;  Ashley S.

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers