Authors: Greaves, Felix; Millett, Christopher; Pape, Utz J; Soljak, Michael; Majeed, Azeem

Source: British Journal of General Practice, Volume 62, Number 594, January 2012 , pp. e46-e54(9)

Publisher: Royal College of General Practitioners

Abstract:

Background:

The ideal population size of healthcare commissioning organisations is not known.

Aim:

To investigate whether there is a relationship between the size of commissioning organisations and how well they perform on a range of performance measures.

Design and setting:

Cross-sectional, observational study of performance in all 152 primary care trusts (PCTs) in England.

Method:

Comparison of PCT size against 36 indicators of commissioning performance, including measures of clinical and preventative effectiveness, patient centredness, access, cost, financial ability, and engagement.

Results:

Fourteen of the 36 indicators have an unadjusted relationship (P<0.05) with size of the PCT. With 10 indicators, there was increasing quality with larger size. However, when population factors including deprivation, ethnicity, rurality, and age were included in the analysis, there was no relationship between size and performance for any measure.

Conclusion:

There is no evidence to suggest that there is an optimum size for PCT performance. Observed variations in PCT performance with size were explained by the characteristics of the populations they served. These findings suggest that configuration of clinical commissioning groups should be geared towards producing organisations that can function effectively across their key responsibilities, rather than being based on the size of their population alone.

Keywords: efficiency, organizational; health facility size; health services research; primary health care; organization & administration; quality indicators; health care; statistics & numerical data

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp12X616364

Affiliations: 1: Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK

Publication date: 2012-01-01

More about this publication?

• The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing articles of interest to family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. The journal's 2010 Impact Factor is 2.07, making it the world's second most highly cited journal of general practice and primary health care.
  
  Recent issues: members of the Royal College of General Practitioners receive complementary access to the British Journal of General Practice. Access is via the members' login area using your RCGP membership details. All users can freely access articles published up to 1 year ago, and the BJGP archive is available via PubMed Central.
  
  Email alerts can be enabled by registering with ingentaconnect. For information, see Help for web users.
• Information for Authors
• Subscribe to this Title
• Membership Information
• BJGP Archive
• ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Public Health
• By this author: Greaves, Felix ;  Millett, Christopher ;  Pape, Utz J ;  Soljak, Michael ;  Majeed, Azeem

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers