Managing self-limiting respiratory tract infections: a qualitative study of the usefulness of the delayed prescribing strategy
Source: British Journal of General Practice, Volume 61, Number 590, September 2011 , pp. e579-e589(11)
Publisher: Royal College of General Practitioners
Despite respiratory tract infections usually being viral and self-limiting, most primary care consultations still result in an antibiotic prescription. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) introduced the ‘delayed prescribing’ (DP) strategy. It remains unknown how useful UK clinicians find this approach
To investigate how DP is used within UK primary care, and the benefits and challenges associated with this strategy
Design and setting
Qualitative interview and focus group study in UK scheduled and unscheduled care primary care settings
Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews (n = 49) and six focus groups with GPs, trainee GPs, and nurse prescribers (NPs). An iterative analysis approach, using grounded theory principles, was used to generate themes from the dataset.
Prescribers were familiarwith DP but used it infrequently. DP was often used to manage diagnostic uncertainty, although NPs, trainee GPs, and GPs working in unscheduled care services preferred patients to reconsult under these circumstances. Prescribers used DP to avoid conflict, although some had found more effective strategies to achieve this. Prescribers were generally uncomfortable giving clinical responsibility to patients, and DP was perceived to communicate a conflicting message to patients about antibiotic efficacy.
DP was not considered to be a helpful strategy for managing patients with self-limiting respiratory tract infections within primary care and the findings do not support the centrality of DP in NICE guidelines as a primary means of reducing antibiotic prescribing. Future training and guidelines should encourage alternative ways of communicating empathy, addressing patient beliefs, and encouraging self-management.
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: 1: School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester 2: School of Community Based Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester 3: North Western Deanery, Manchester
Publication date: 2011-09-01
- The British Journal of General Practice (BJGP) is an international journal publishing articles of interest to family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. The journal's 2012 Impact Factor is 2.034, making it one of the world's most highly cited journals of general practice and primary health care.
Members of the Royal College of General Practitioners receive complementary access to recent issues of the BJGP. Access is via the members' login area using RCGP membership details. All users can find access help for current and archive articles at Accessing BJGP.
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- Information for Advertisers
- BJGP Current Issue
- BJGP Archive
- BJGP Discussion Forum
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites