Acupuncture for ‘frequent attenders’ with medically unexplained symptoms: a randomised controlled trial (CACTUS study)
Source: British Journal of General Practice, Volume 61, Number 587, June 2011 , pp. e295-e305(11)
Publisher: Royal College of General Practitioners
Medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) are common and difficult to treat.
To investigate the effectiveness of adding five-element acupuncture to usual care in ‘frequent attenders’ with MUPS.
Design and setting:
Randomised controlled trial in four London general practices.
Participants were 80 adults with MUPS, consulting GPs ≥8 times/year. The intervention was individualised five-element acupuncture, ≥12 sessions, immediately (acupuncture group) and after 26 weeks (control group). The primary outcome was 26-week Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP); secondary outcomes were wellbeing (W-BQ12), EQ-5D, and GP consultation rate. Intention-to-treat analysis was used, adjusting for baseline outcomes.
Participants (80% female, mean age 50 years, mixed ethnicity) had high health-resource use. Problems were 59% musculoskeletal; 65% >1 year duration. The 26-week questionnaire response rate was 89%. Compared to baseline, the mean 26-week MYMOP improved by 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.4 to 1.5) in the acupuncture group and 0.6 (95% CI = 0.3 to 0.9) in the control group (adjusted mean difference: acupuncture versus control –0.6 [95% CI = –1.1 to 0] P = 0.05). Other between-group adjusted mean differences were: W-BQ12 4.4 (95% CI = 1.6 to 7.2) P = 0.002; EQ-5D index 0.03 (95% CI = –0.11 to 0.16) P = 0.70; consultation rate ratio 0.90 (95% CI = 0.70 to 1.15) P = 0.4; and number of medications 0.56 (95% CI = 0.47 to 1.6) P = 0.28. All differences favoured the acupuncture group. Imputation for missing values reduced the MYMOP adjusted mean difference to –0.4 (95% CI = –0.9 to 0.1) P = 0.12. Improvements in MYMOP and W-BQ12 were maintained at 52 weeks.
The addition of 12 sessions of five-element acupuncture to usual care resulted in improved health status and wellbeing that was sustained for 12 months.
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: 1: Institute of Health Services Research, Peninsula Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK 2: School of Health Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK 3: School of Community and Health Sciences, City University London, UK 4: London Institute of Five-Element Acupuncture London, UK
Publication date: June 2011
- The British Journal of General Practice (BJGP) is an international journal publishing articles of interest to family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. The journal's 2012 Impact Factor is 2.034, making it one of the world's most highly cited journals of general practice and primary health care.
Members of the Royal College of General Practitioners receive complementary access to recent issues of the BJGP. Access is via the members' login area using RCGP membership details. All users can find access help for current and archive articles at Accessing BJGP.
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- Information for Advertisers
- BJGP Current Issue
- BJGP Archive
- BJGP Discussion Forum
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites