Authors: Fleetcroft, Robert¹; Parekh-Bhurke, Sheetal¹; Howe, Amanda¹; Cookson, Richard²; Swift, Louise¹; Steel, Nicholas¹

Source: British Journal of General Practice, Volume 60, Number 578, September 2010 , pp. e345-e352(8)

Publisher: Royal College of General Practitioners

Abstract:

Background

General practices in the UK contract with the government to receive additional payments for high-quality primary care. Little is known about the resulting impact on population health.

Aim

To estimate the potential reduction in population mortality from implementation of the pay-for-performance contract in England.

Design of study

Cross-sectional and modelling study.

Setting

Primary care in England.

Method

Twenty-five clinical quality indicators in the contract had controlled trial evidence of mortality benefit. This was combined with condition prevalence, and the differences in performance before and after contract implementation, to estimate the potential mortality reduction per indicator. Improvement was adjusted for pre-existing trends where data were available.

Results

The 2004 contract potentially reduced mortality by 11 lives per 100 000 people (lower-upper estimates 7-16) over 1 year, as performance improved from baseline to the target for full incentive payment. If all eligible patients were treated, over and above the target, 56 (29-81) lives per 100 000 might have been saved. For the 2006 contract, mortality reduction was effectively zero, because new baseline performance for a typical practice had already exceeded the target performance for full payment.

Conclusion

The contract may have delivered substantial health gain, but potential health gain was limited by performance targets for full payment being set lower than typical baseline performance. Information on both baseline performance and population health gain should inform decisions about future selection of indicators for pay-for-performance schemes, and the level of performance at which full payment is triggered.

References: 15 references open in new window

Articles that cite this article?

Keywords: physician incentive plans; primary health care; quality indicators; quality of health care

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp10X515359

Affiliations: 1: School of Medicine Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Nowich 2: Department of Social Policy and SocialWork, University of York, York

Publication date: 2010-09-01

More about this publication?

• The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing articles of interest to family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. The journal's 2010 Impact Factor is 2.07, making it the world's second most highly cited journal of general practice and primary health care.
  
  Recent issues: members of the Royal College of General Practitioners receive complementary access to the British Journal of General Practice. Access is via the members' login area using your RCGP membership details. All users can freely access articles published up to 1 year ago, and the BJGP archive is available via PubMed Central.
  
  Email alerts can be enabled by registering with ingentaconnect. For information, see Help for web users.
• Information for Authors
• Subscribe to this Title
• Membership Information
• BJGP Archive
• ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Public Health
• By this author: Fleetcroft, Robert ;  Parekh-Bhurke, Sheetal ;  Howe, Amanda ;  Cookson, Richard ;  Swift, Louise ;  Steel, Nicholas

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers