Authors: Vedavanam, Sivatharan; Steel, Nicholas; Broadbent, Joanne; Maisey, Susan; Howe, Amanda

Source: British Journal of General Practice, Volume 59, Number 559, February 2009 , pp. e32-e37(6)

Publisher: Royal College of General Practitioners

Abstract:

Background

Depression is a leading cause of disease and disability internationally, and is responsible for many primary care consultations. Little is known about the quality of primary care for depression in the UK.

Aim

To determine the prevalence of good-quality primary care for depression, and to analyse variations in quality by patient and practice characteristics.

Design of study

Retrospective observational study.

Setting

Eighteen general practices in England.

Method

Medical records were examined for 279 patients. The percentage of eligible participants diagnosed with depression who received the care specified by each of six quality indicators in 2002 and 2004 was assessed. Associations between quality achievement and age, sex, patient deprivation score, timepoint, and practice size were estimated using logistic regression.

Results

There was very wide variation in achievement of different indicators (range 1-97%). Achievement was higher for indicators referring to treatment and follow-up than for indicators referring to history taking. Achievement of quality indicators was low overall (37%). Quality did not vary significantly by patient or practice characteristics.

Conclusion

There is substantial scope for improvement in the quality of primary care for depression, if the highest achievement rates could be matched for all indicators. Given the lack of variation by practice characteristics, system-level and educational interventions may be the best ways to improve quality. The equitable distribution of quality by patient deprivation score is an important achievement that may be challenging to maintain as quality improves.

References: 20 references open in new window

Articles that cite this article?

Keywords: depression; primary health care; quality indicators; quality of health care

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X395085

Affiliations: 1: Primary Care Group, School of Medicine, University of East Anglia, Norwich

Publication date: 2009-02-01

More about this publication?

• The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing articles of interest to family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. The journal's 2010 Impact Factor is 2.07, making it the world's second most highly cited journal of general practice and primary health care.

  Recent issues: members of the Royal College of General Practitioners receive complimentary access to the British Journal of General Practice. Access is via the members' login area using your RCGP membership details. All users can freely access articles published up to 1 year ago, and the BJGP archive is available via PubMed Central.
  
  Email alerts can be enabled by registering with IngentaConnect. For information, see Help for web users.

• Information for Authors
• Subscribe to this Title
• Membership Information
• BJGP Archive
• ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Public Health
• By this author: Vedavanam, Sivatharan ;  Steel, Nicholas ;  Broadbent, Joanne ;  Maisey, Susan ;  Howe, Amanda

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers