Authors: Whalley, Diane¹; Gravelle, Hugh²; Sibbald, Bonnie¹

Source: British Journal of General Practice, Volume 58, Number 546, January 2008 , pp. 8-14(7)

Publisher: Royal College of General Practitioners

Abstract:

Background

An ambitious pay-for-performance system was implemented in UK general practice in 2004 amid doubts that it could improve both the working lives of doctors and quality of care.

Aim

To evaluate doctors' perceptions of their working lives and quality of care before and after the new contract.

Design of study

Longitudinal questionnaire survey.

Setting

England, UK.

Method

A longitudinal postal survey of English GPs in February 2004 and September 2005. Measures included reported job satisfaction (7-point scale), hours worked, income, and impact of the contract.

Results

Responses were available from 2105 doctors in 2004 and 1349 in 2005. Mean overall job satisfaction increased from 4.58 out of 7 in 2004 to 5.17 in 2005. The greatest improvements in satisfaction were with remuneration and hours of work. Mean reported hours worked fell from 44.5 to 40.8. Mean income increased from an estimated £73 400 in 2004 to £92 600 in 2005. Most GPs reported that the new contract had increased their income (88%), but decreased their professional autonomy (71 %), and increased their administrative (94%) and clinical (86%) workloads. After the introduction of the contract doctors were more positive than they had anticipated about its impact on quality of care.

Conclusion

GPs' job satisfaction increased after the introduction of the new contract, despite perceptions of negative consequences for workload and autonomy. GPs reported working fewer hours with a higher income, and their expectations regarding the impact of the contract on quality of care had been exceeded.

References: 42 references open in new window

Articles that cite this article?

Keywords: job satisfaction; primary care; quality of health care; workforce

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp08X263758

Affiliations: 1: National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester 2: National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York

Publication date: 2008-01-01

More about this publication?

• The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing articles of interest to family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. The journal's 2010 Impact Factor is 2.07, making it the world's second most highly cited journal of general practice and primary health care.

  Recent issues: members of the Royal College of General Practitioners receive complimentary access to the British Journal of General Practice. Access is via the members' login area using your RCGP membership details. All users can freely access articles published up to 1 year ago, and the BJGP archive is available via PubMed Central.
  
  Email alerts can be enabled by registering with IngentaConnect. For information, see Help for web users.

• Information for Authors
• Subscribe to this Title
• Membership Information
• BJGP Archive
• ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Public Health
• By this author: Whalley, Diane ;  Gravelle, Hugh ;  Sibbald, Bonnie

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers