Authors: Porteous, Terry¹; Ryan, Mandy²; Bond, Christine M.³; Hannaford, Phil⁴

Source: British Journal of General Practice, Volume 56, Number 533, December 2006 , pp. 911-917(7)

Publisher: Royal College of General Practitioners

Abstract:

Aim:

To determine the relative importance of factors that influence decision making in the management of minor illness, and how people trade between these factors.

Design of study:

Discrete choice experiment.

Setting:

Scottish electoral roll.

Method:

Six hundred and fifty-two responders of a previous national survey were invited to complete a discrete choice experiment questionnaire. This was used to measure relative preferences for managing symptoms of minor illness often associated with analgesic use. Three attributes were identified as important to participants: type of management, availability, and cost of managing symptoms. Trade-offs between these attributes were examined.

Results:

A 57% response rate was achieved (51% valid response rate). People preferred to manage symptoms by self-care and were willing to pay almost £23 to do so. Community pharmacy was the preferred source of advice. Responders preferred less waiting time and paying less money when managing symptoms, and were willing to trade between factors. A less preferred type of management became more attractive when waiting times and cost were reduced.

Conclusion:

Findings suggest that self-care is the preferred method of managing symptoms of minor illness. When developing services to support self-care, policy makers should invest in services that reduce waiting times and incur least cost to users.

References: 10 references open in new window

Articles that cite this article?

Keywords: DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT; MINOR ILLNESS; SELF CARE

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: Department of General Practice, University of Aberdeen 2: Professor of health economics, Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen 3: Professor of primary care (pharmacy), Department of General Practice, University of Aberdeen 4: Grampian professor of primary care, Department of General Practice, University of Aberdeen

Publication date: 2006-12-01

More about this publication?

• The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing articles of interest to family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. The journal's 2010 Impact Factor is 2.07, making it the world's second most highly cited journal of general practice and primary health care.

  Recent issues: members of the Royal College of General Practitioners receive complimentary access to the British Journal of General Practice. Access is via the members' login area using your RCGP membership details. All users can freely access articles published up to 1 year ago, and the BJGP archive is available via PubMed Central.
  
  Email alerts can be enabled by registering with IngentaConnect. For information, see Help for web users.

• Information for Authors
• Subscribe to this Title
• Membership Information
• BJGP Archive
• ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Public Health
• By this author: Porteous, Terry ;  Ryan, Mandy ;  Bond, Christine M. ;  Hannaford, Phil

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers