What influences participants' treatment preference and can it influence outcome? Results from a primary care-based randomised trial for shoulder pain
Authors: Thomas, Elaine1; Croft, Peter R.1; Paterson, Susan M.1; Dziedzic, Krysia1; Hay, Elaine M.2
Source: British Journal of General Practice, Volume 54, Number 499, February 2004 , pp. 93-96(4)
Publisher: Royal College of General Practitioners
Abstract:
Background: In randomised clinical trials (RCTs), outcome may be influenced by the opinions of the participants about the efficacy of treatments. Aim: To examine how initial treatment preferences of participants in a shoulder pain trial affected functional outcome and future treatment preferences. Design of study: Observational cohort study nested within a multicentre, pragmatic RCT of steroid injection versus physiotherapy for unilateral shoulder pain. Setting: Nine general practices in north Staffordshire. Method: Two hundred and seven adults were randomised in the trial. Disability scores and preferences of the participants for the trial treatments were elicited at two points: prior to randomisation and 6 months post-randomisation. A good functional outcome was defined as at least a halving in the disability score at the 6 months follow-up point. Results: Pre-randomisation preferences were: 40% for injection and 20% for physiotherapy, and 40% gave no preference. A good outcome was achieved in a higher percentage of participants who gave a pre-randomisation treatment preference compared with those who did not (62% compared with 48% percentage difference = 14%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1 to 27%) with similar percentages in each preferred treatment group. However, receiving the preferred treatment did not confer any additional benefit in those who expressed a preference (receiving preferred treatment = 56%; not receiving preferred treatment = 69%). At 6 months post-randomisation, participants with a good, as opposed to poor, outcome were more likely to report as their preferred treatment the one to which they had been randomised, irrespective of pre-randomisation preference and whether the preferred treatment was received. Conclusion: This analysis suggests that preferences prior to treatment can affect outcome, but that treatment outcome is a stronger influence on post-treatment preferences. We present some empirical evidence to support the statement that treatment preferences can have important effects on the results of RCTs.Keywords: PATIENT PREFERENCE; COHORT STUDIES; SHOULDER PAIN; RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIALS; PHYSIOTHERAPY; STEROID INJECTION
Document Type: Research article
Affiliations: 1: Primary Care Sciences Research Centre, Keele University 2: Primary Care Sciences Research Centre, Keele University and the Staffordshire Rheumatology Centre

Click here for Page Help