A factorial randomised controlled trial of decision analysis and an information video plus leaflet for newly diagnosed hypertensive patients

Authors: Montgomery A.A.; Fahey T.; Peters T.J.

Source: British Journal of General Practice, Volume 53, Number 491, June 2003 , pp. 446-453(8)

Publisher: Royal College of General Practitioners

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Background: There is a lack of evidence regarding the value of to ls designed to aid decision making in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension.

Aim: To evaluate two interventions for as isting newly diagnosed hypertensive patients in the decision whether to start drug therapy for reducing blood pressure.

Design of study: Factorial randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Twenty-one general practices in south-west England, UK.

Method: Adults aged 32 to 80 years with newly diagnosed hypertension were randomised to receive either: (a) computerised utility assessment interview with individualised risk assessment and decision analysis; or (b) information video and leaflet about high blood pres ure; or (c) both interventions; or (d) neither intervention. Outcome measures were decisional conflict, knowledge, state anxiety, intentions regarding starting treatment, and actual treatment decision.

Results: Of 217 patients randomised, 212 (98%) were analysed at the primary fol ow-up (mean age = 59 years, 49% female). Decision analysis patients had lower decisional conflict than those who did not receive this intervention (27.6 versus 38.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] for adjusted difference = -13.0 to -5.8, P <0.001), greater knowledge about hypertension (73% versus 67%, adjusted 95% CI = 2% to 9%, P = 0.0 3) and no evidence of increased state anxiety (34.8 versus 36.8, adjusted 95% CI = -5.6 to 0.1, P = 0.055). Video/leaflet patients had lower decisional conflict than corresponding controls (30.3 versus 36.8, adjusted 95% CI = -7.4 to -0.6, P = 0.021), greater knowledge (75% versus 65%, adjusted 95% CI = 6% to 13%, P <0.0 1) and no evidence of increased state anxiety (35.7 versus 36.1, adjusted 95% CI = -3.9 to 1.7, P = 0.46). There were no differences between either of the interventions and their respective controls in the proportion of patients prescribed antihypertensive medication (67%).

Conclusions: This trial demonstrates that, among patients facing a real treatment decision, interventions to inform patients about hypertension and to clarify patients' values concerning outcomes of treatment are f ective in reducing decisional conflict and increasing patient knowledge, while not resulting in any increases in state anxiety.

Keywords: DECISION-MAKING TOOLS; PATIENT CHOICE; HYPERTENSION; RANDOMISED; CONTROLLED; TRIAL.

Document Type: Research article

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$31.30 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A