Counterfactual closeness and predicted affect

The full text article is temporarily unavailable.

We apologise for the inconvenience. Please try again later.

Abstract:

Empirical research on counterfactual thinking has found a closeness effect: people report higher negative affect if an actual outcome is close to a better counterfactual outcome. However, it remains unclear what actually is a “close” miss. In three experiments that manipulate close counterfactuals, closeness effects were found only when closeness was unambiguously defined either with respect to a contrasted alternative, or with respect to a categorical boundary. In a real task people failed to report greater negative affect when encountering a close numerical miss, while they predicted greater negative affect hypothetically. These results show that counterfactual closeness effects on affect depend on closeness being accessible and unambiguously defined.

Keywords: Closeness; Counterfactual thinking; Folk psychology; Mutability

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2011.562079

Affiliations: Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

Publication date: May 1, 2011

Related content

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more