Contiguity and the outcome density bias in action–outcome contingency judgements

Authors: Vallée-Tourangeau, Frédéric¹; Murphy, Robin²; Baker, A. G.³

Source: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology B, Volume 58, Number 2, April 2005 , pp. 177-192(16)

Publisher: Psychology Press, part of the Taylor & Francis Group

Buy & download fulltext article:

Price: $50.43 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

In cause–outcome contingency judgement tasks, judgements often reflect the actual contingency but are also influenced by the overall probability of the outcome, P(O). Action–outcome instrumental learning tasks can foster a pattern in which judgements of positive contingencies become less positive as P(O) increases. Variable contiguity between the action and the outcome may produce this bias. Experiment 1 recorded judgements of positive contingencies that were largely uninfluenced by P(O) using an immediate contiguity procedure. Experiment 2 directly compared variable versus constant contiguity. The predicted interaction between contiguity and P(O) was observed for positive contingencies. These results stress the sensitivity of the causal learning mechanism to temporal contiguity.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02724990444000104

Affiliations: 1: Kingston University, Kingston upon Thames, UK 2: University College London, London, UK 3: McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Publication date: 2005-04-01

More about this publication?