Unwanted Beliefs: Age Differences in Beliefs of False Information

Author: Chen Y.

Source: Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition (Neuropsychology, Development and Cogniti, Volume 9, Number 3, October 2002 , pp. 217-230(14)

Publisher: Psychology Press, part of the Taylor & Francis Group

Buy & download fulltext article:

Price: $50.43 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Two experiments were conducted to test the Spinozan model of believing. Because of their reduced cognitive resources, older adults were predicted to be more likely than young adults to believe false information. Experiment 1 used a dispositional attribution paradigm to test this hypothesis. Young and older adults were exposed to both true and false (either positive or negative) trait information about the target persons. Participants then made dispositional ratings and evaluated the target persons on overall likeability scales. Results supported the Spinozan model of believing. Older adults were more likely than young adults to believe false information and their dispositional ratings were reliably biased by the valence of false information. Experiment 2 further examined whether these false beliefs of older adults were actually conscious beliefs. It was found that older adults consciously recollected the false statements as true and these false beliefs mediated age differences in dispositional attribution.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/anec.9.3.217.9613

Publication date: 2002-10-01