Rigorous, Rapid, Reliable and Qualitative? Computing in Qualitative Method
Abstract:Objective: To explore whether qualitative methods are problematic and persuasive in health education research. Method: Explored this problem through the 3 goals of rigor, rapidity, and reliability and their special meanings in qualitative analysis. Results: For each, contributions of qualitative computing software are identified and their effects assessed. Conclusion: Qualitative researchers are assisted by software tools in pursuit of each of these goals, but in each area there is a need for software design to address the tasks of research where rigor, rapidity, and reliability are paramount requirements.
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: QSR International, Doncaster, Vic, Australia.
Publication date: November 1, 2002
The American Journal of Health Behavior seeks to improve the quality of life through multidisciplinary health efforts in fostering a better understanding of the multidimensional nature of both individuals and social systems as they relate to health behaviors.
The Journal aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the impact of personal attributes, personality characteristics, behavior patterns, social structure, and processes on health maintenance, health restoration, and health improvement; to disseminate knowledge of holistic, multidisciplinary approaches to designing and implementing effective health programs; and to showcase health behavior analysis skills that have been proven to affect health improvement and recovery.
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Review Board
- Reprints and Permissions
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites