Comparison of Rated and Ranked Health and Lifestyle Values
Abstract:Objective: Values are typically ranked; however, ratings have desirable administrative and statistical properties. The purpose of the present study was to determine the better format to measure health and lifestyle values: traditional ranking or Likert-type rating. Methods: Psychometric properties of the two survey formats were compared on a sample of 183 first-year university students. Results: The ranking format had higher one-week test-retest reliabilities than did ratings (median .66 vs .60) but consistently lower validities when compared to self-report health behaviors. Conclusion: Results: from the present study suggest that a rating format for health and lifestyle value items should be used.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: September 1, 1999
The American Journal of Health Behavior seeks to improve the quality of life through multidisciplinary health efforts in fostering a better understanding of the multidimensional nature of both individuals and social systems as they relate to health behaviors.
The Journal aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the impact of personal attributes, personality characteristics, behavior patterns, social structure, and processes on health maintenance, health restoration, and health improvement; to disseminate knowledge of holistic, multidisciplinary approaches to designing and implementing effective health programs; and to showcase health behavior analysis skills that have been proven to affect health improvement and recovery.
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Review Board
- Reprints and Permissions
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites