If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to Represent Farmer Decisions

$25.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Buy Article:

Abstract:

In this chapter, a structural equation model (SEM) is specified, estimated, tested and modified. Subsequently, the results are presented and discussed in detail. Referring to modification, the SEM approach, taken here, includes a feedback mechanism to eventually improve the model. The basic approach of SEM is a confirmatory one, i.e., hypotheses are put forward and subsequently confirmed or rejected by the model without modifying the model. However, JĂ–RESKOG (1993) introduced a more concise differentiation between three different strategies for structural equation modeling. A strictly confirmatory strategy, the strategy of alternative models, and a model generating approach. Following the first strategy, in the purely confirmatory mode, the researcher hypothesizes one single model based on a theory.

Keywords: Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to Represent Farmer Decisions

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: January 1, 2009

More about this publication?
  • Rural Development through Carbon Finance
    In a timely contribution to the international discussion of the post-Kyoto climate regime this study hypothesizes that Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) projects in the land use and forestry sector are an efficient instrument for climate change mitigation that contributes to rural development and poverty alleviation at the same time. To this end, the study analyzes socio-economic aspects of a forestry project established under the CDM rules considering an East African case study exemplarily. An agricultural household survey in Tanzania delivered the empirical data for the structural equation model at the center of the analysis. Looking at different farm assets it is shown that the benefits of land use-related climate projects go way beyond pure mitigation. They also have a positive impact on a very broad asset base on which poor farm households depend. Hence, the current CDM only allowing for afforestation and reforestation projects is far too restricted to deliver on its twin objective.
  • Submit a Paper
  • Purchase hard copy print edition
  • Learn more about Peter Lang @ GSE Research
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
Related content

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more