Molecular Biopolitics, Somatic Ethics and the Spirit of Biocapital
Author: Rose, Nikolas1
Source: Social Theory & Health, Volume 5, Number 1, February 2007 , pp. 3-29(27)
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content
Abstract:
In this contribution, I decribe some of the key mutations occuring in contemporary biopolitics, suggesting they are linked to changes in the styles of thought, objects, forms of organization and technologies of the contemporary life sciences, and to their intense capitlization. I name these molecularization, optimization, subjectification, expertise, and bioeconomics. I suggest that these are giving rise to a new molecular ontology of life, a `flattened' biomedical epistemology, and circuits of vitality, in which the elements of life are accorded a new mobility. Vitality can now be decomposed, stabilized, frozen, banked, stored, commoditized, accumulated, exchanged, traded across time, across space, across organs and species, across diverse contexts and enterprises in the service of both health and wealth. I suggest that we have seen the birth of a new `somatic' sense of ourselves, which extends to self and identity itself - hence we are becoming `neurochemical selves'. Our corporeal existence has gained unrival salience in our conduct of our lives - our `Lebensführung' is now shaped by what I term a somatic ethic. In conclusion, I argue that there is an `elective affinity' between this somatic ethic and the `spirit of biocapital'.Social Theory & Health (2007) 5, 3-29. doi:10.1057/palgrave.sth.8700084Document Type: Research article
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.sth.8700084
Affiliations: 1: 1London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content
Click here for Page Help