Skip to main content

When is patent infringement not patent infringement? Merck v Integra and the ‘safe harbour’

Buy Article:

$43.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

The Supreme Court recently ruled on the scope of the patent infringement ‘safe harbour’ of 35 U.S.C. ยง271(e)(1), which was passed by Congress in 1984 to allow generic drug manufacturers to test their drugs before the expiration of the patents that covered the drugs. The scope of the safe harbour has been interpreted by the courts to be much broader than that, and the Supreme Court confirmed the breadth of the exemption. The Supreme Court did not, however, address the application of the safe harbour to research tools, an issue of vast commercial importance. This paper traces the history of the safe harbour and the Merck v Integra decision, and explains the current state of the law and where the law may be going.Journal of Commercial Biotechnology (2006) 13, 37–42. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jcb.3050036

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jcb.3050036

Publication date: October 1, 2006

pal/jcb/2006/00000013/00000001/art00005
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more