Skip to main content

The fallacy of large numbers revisited: The construction of a utility function that leads to the acceptance of two games, while one is rejected

Buy Article:

$44.95 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Should the composition of an investment portfolio differ depending on whether the investment horizon is longer or shorter? Practitioners have always allocated more risky investments to portfolios with longer investment horizons. But in 1963, P. A. Samuelson put forward strong arguments that this is an erroneous approach. Since then, the financial community has lived with this conflict and searched for plausible explanations. In this paper, however, we construct a counterexample to the thesis of 1963.Journal of Asset Management (2001) 1, 257–266; doi:10.1057/palgrave.jam.2240020
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: 1Fortis Investment Management, Boulevard Roi Albert II, 1, 1210, Brussels, Belgium., Tel: +32 2274 8487, Fax: +32 2274 8206, Email: [email protected] 2: 2Chief Economist of Fortis Bank, Professor at the Free University of Brussels, and Member of the Executive Committee of Association Belge des OPC

Publication date: 2001-01-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more