Skip to main content

Liberal Pluralism: A Reply to Talisse

Buy Article:

$44.95 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Liberal pluralism is a comprehensive account and justification of liberal democracy that rests on three premises: an account of the structure of morality (value pluralism); an account of the structure of political life (political pluralism); and an account of action oriented toward a conception of the good (expressive liberty). In a critique, Robert Talisse contends that no coherent path can lead from value pluralism to the justification of liberalism. The only coherent options are to: (a) affirm value pluralism while denying the general validity of liberalism; (b) offer a general justification of liberalism based on non-pluralist premises; or (c) acknowledge that the justification of liberalism can only be ‘political’ (in Rawls's sense) rather than comprehensive. In response, I defend the coherence of a justification of liberalism that incorporates value pluralism as a key premise.Contemporary Political Theory (2004) 3, 140–147. doi:10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300148
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1School of Public Affairs, University of Maryland, Van Munching Hall, College Park, USA., Email: [email protected]

Publication date: 01 August 2004

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more