Correlation and conversion of plasma cholinesterase activity values using three techniques
Correlación y conversión entre los valores de actividad de la colinesterasa plasmática medida por tres técnicas diferentes

Author: Carmona-Fonseca, Jaime1

Source: Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública/Pan American Journal of Public Health, Volume 22, Number 1, July 2007 , pp. 35-40(6)

Publisher: Pan American Health Organization (PAHO)

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Objectives: To determine mathematical correlations of three quantitative techniques to measure plasma cholinesterase, using reference values already established for two populations in the department of Antioquia, Colombia.

Methods: In this descriptive, cross-sectional, prospective study, two independent, representative samples of working adults (18 to 65 years old) were examined. In both samples the adults worked for businesses associated with Colombia's Social Security system. Adults in the two samples had not been exposed to cholinesterase-inhibiting pesticides. The samples were from two neighboring regions of the department of Antioquia: one sample (415 adults) was from the Aburrá Valley, and the other (412 adults) was from Oriente Antioqueño (Eastern Antioquia). Plasma cholinesterase (EC 3.1.1.8) was measured using three quantitative methods: Michel, EQM, and Monotest. Linear regression equations were developed to correlate results of these three techniques.

Results: Six simple linear regression equations were defined to show the relationship of three measurement techniques for plasma cholinesterase. There was a moderate correlation of the three techniques (r = 0.686 to 0.771), but it increased (r = 0.744 to 0.811) when 12 (1.5%) outliers were eliminated. Associations among the three techniques were highly significant (P < 0.001). The adjusted equations for Y = a + bX are: EQM (U/mL) = 0.40773 + 1.8757 (Michel [delta pH/h]); Michel (delta pH/h) = 0.25799 + 0.33871 (EQM [U/mL]); Monotest (U/L) = 462.0 + 4 565.0 (Michel [delta pH/h]); Michel (delta pH/h) = 0.42956 + 0.00012125 (Monotest [U/L]); EQM (U/mL) = 0.75333 + 0.00031056 (Monotest [U/L]); and Monotest (U/L) = 262.0 + 2 118.0 (EQM [U/mL]).

Conclusions: The proposed mathematical models allow conversion of cholinesterase activity values using the Michel, EQM, and Monotest techniques. These models can be of assistance in Colombia and other countries where a variety of measurement techniques are used, and where it becomes difficult to compare the results of different studies. Having mathematical models available for conversion of established values can be beneficial whether for clinical or epidemiological purposes.

Spanish
Objetivo: Determinar las relaciones matemáticas entre tres técnicas cuantitativas empleadas para medir la actividad de la colinesterasa plasmática, a partir de los valores de referencia ya establecidos para dos poblaciones de Antioquia, Colombia.

Métodos: Diseño descriptivo, transversal y prospectivo. Se conformaron dos muestras independientes representativas de la población laboral adulta (18-65 años), no expuesta a plaguicidas inhibidores de la colinesterasa y vinculada al Seguro Social, del valle de Aburrá (415 personas) y del cercano oriente antioqueño (412 personas), del departamento de Antioquia, Colombia. La colinesterasa plasmática (EC 3.1.1.8) se midió mediante tres técnicas cuantitativas: Michel, EQM® y Monotest®. Se elaboraron ecuaciones de regresión que relacionaran entre sí los resultados de las tres técnicas estudiadas.

Resultados: Se definieron seis ecuaciones de regresión lineal simple que permitieron relacionar los resultados de las tres técnicas de medición de colinesterasa plasmática analizadas. La correlación entre las técnicas fue moderada (r: de 0,686 a 0,771), pero aumentó (r: de 0,744 a 0,811) al eliminar 12 (1,5%) valores extremos. Las asociaciones entre las técnicas fueron altamente significativas (P < 0,001). Las ecuaciones Y = a + bX ajustadas son: EQM (U/mL) = 0,40773 + 1,8757 (Michel [delta pH/hora]); Michel (delta pH/hora) = 0,25799 + 0,33871 (EQM [U/mL]); Monotest (U/L) = 462,0 + 4 565,0 (Michel [delta pH/hora]); Michel (delta pH/hora) = 0,42956 + 0,00012125 (Monotest [U/L]); EQM (U/mL) = 0,75333 + 0,00031056 (Monotest [U/L]); y Monotest (U/L) = 262,0 + 2 118,0 (EQM [U/mL]).

Conclusiones: Los modelos propuestos permiten convertir los valores de actividad de la colinesterasa medida con las tres técnicas estudiadas.

Keywords: BLOOD CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; BUTYRYLCHOLINESTERASE; CHOLINESTERASE INHIBITORS; HUMANS; LABORATORY TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES; PESTICIDES; COLOMBIA

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: Facultad de Medicina, Grupo de Malaria, Universidad de Antioquia, Calle 62 No. 52-59, Laboratorio 610, Medellín, Colombia

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$18.60 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A