An Interesting Fallacy Concerning Dynamical Supertasks

Author: Pérez Laraudogoitia, Jon

Source: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Volume 56, Number 2, June 2005 , pp. 321-334(14)

Buy & download fulltext article:

Price: $35.78 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Recently, Alper, Bridger, Earman and Norton have all proposed examples of dynamic systems that, in their view, are incompatible with classical (Newtonian) mechanics. In the first section of the present paper I shall show that their arguments are all undermined by the same fallacy. The second section proves that their conclusions of incompatibility are indeed false, and that what we are really looking at are new forms of indeterminist evolution of the same kind as that found recently in the literature on supertasks. In the third section of the paper, I argue that one of these new forms of evolution is particularly interesting, and that analysis of it leads to a new vision of the relation between interaction by contact and impenetrability.

Introduction</ITEM><ITEM>

The fallacy</ITEM><ITEM>

Understanding some physical supertasks</ITEM><ITEM>

A philosophically interesting implication: contact and impenetrability</ITEM></LIST>

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axi119

Publication date: 2005-06-01

More about this publication?

For over fifty years The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science has published the best international work in the philosophy of science under a distinguished list of editors including A. C. Crombie, Mary Hesse, Imre Lakatos, D. H. Mellor and David Papineau.