What Perception Is Doing, and What it Is Not Doing, in Mathematical Reasoning

Author: Lomas D.

Source: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Volume 53, Number 2, June 2002 , pp. 205-223(19)

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $35.78 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

What is perception doing in mathematical reasoning? To address this question, I discuss the role of perception in geometric reasoning. Perception of the shape properties of concrete diagrams provides, I argue, a surrogate consciousness of the shape properties of the abstract geometric objects depicted in the diagrams. Some of what perception is not doing in mathematical reasoning is also discussed. I take issue with both Parsons and Maddy. Parsons claims that we perceive a certain type of abstract object. Maddy claims (at least at one time claimed) that perception provides the basis for intuition of mathematical sets.

1 Mathematical reasoning with diagrams

2 Do we perceive abstract objects?

3 Do we perceive mathematical sets?

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjps/53.2.205

Publication date: 2002-06-01

More about this publication?
  • For over fifty years The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science has published the best international work in the philosophy of science under a distinguished list of editors including A. C. Crombie, Mary Hesse, Imre Lakatos, D. H. Mellor and David Papineau.
Related content

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page