What Perception Is Doing, and What it Is Not Doing, in Mathematical Reasoning

Author: Lomas D.

Source: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Volume 53, Number 2, June 2002 , pp. 205-223(19)

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

What is perception doing in mathematical reasoning? To address this question, I discuss the role of perception in geometric reasoning. Perception of the shape properties of concrete diagrams provides, I argue, a surrogate consciousness of the shape properties of the abstract geometric objects depicted in the diagrams. Some of what perception is not doing in mathematical reasoning is also discussed. I take issue with both Parsons and Maddy. Parsons claims that we perceive a certain type of abstract object. Maddy claims (at least at one time claimed) that perception provides the basis for intuition of mathematical sets.

1 Mathematical reasoning with diagrams

2 Do we perceive abstract objects?

3 Do we perceive mathematical sets?

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1093/bjps/53.2.205

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$34.96 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A