The Non-Identity of a Material Thing and Its Matter
Author: Kit Fine
Source: Mind, Volume 112, Number 446, March 2003 , pp. 195-234(40)
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Abstract:
There is a well-known argument from Leibniz's Law for the view that coincident material things may be distinct. For given that they differ in their properties, then how can they be the same? However, many philosophers have suggested that this apparent difference in properties is the product of a linguistic illusion; there is just one thing out there, but different sorts or guises under which it may be described. I attempt to show that this opacity defence has intolerable consequences for the functioning of our language and that the original argument should therefore be allowed to stand.Document Type: Research article
Publication date: 2003-03-01
- Mind has long been a leading journal in philosophy. For well over 100 years it has presented the best of cutting edge thought from epistemology, metaphysics, philosophy of language, philosophy of logic, and philosophy of mind. Mind continues its tradition of excellence today. Mind has always enjoyed a strong reputation for the high standards established by its editors and receives around 350 submissions each year. The editor seeks advice from a large number of expert referees, including members of the network of Associate Editors and his international advisers. Mind is published quarterly.
- In this: publication
- By this: publisher
- In this Subject: Philosophy
- By this author: Kit Fine

Shopping cart
Receive new issue alert