John Entick's and Ann Fisher's Dictionaries: An Eighteenth-century Case of (Cons)Piracy?1 This paper is a contribution to the research project BFF 2002-00659 co-sponsored by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology and European FEDER funds. We want to thank Dr Ingrid Tieken-Boon Van Ostade and the anonymous reviewers of IJL for useful suggestions which have enriched this article.

Authors: Rodríguez-Álvarez, Alicia; Rodríguez-Gil, María Esther

Source: International Journal of Lexicography, Volume 19, Number 3, September 2006 , pp. 287-319(33)

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

In the eighteenth century a combination of economic and social circumstances gave rise to a debate over the notions of authorship and originality in London. The growing diffusion of printed works caused an increasing popularity of certain authors who were on the way to professionalization. An accurate attribution of works became thus a key point in their careers and incomes, but also in those of influential booksellers who, zealous of their business, used their power to protect their investment. This zeal, notwithstanding, did not prevent authors from copying, using and imitating other authors without acknowledging their sources. Such a practice caused problems of authorship, as in the case of the dictionaries written by Entick, The New Spelling Dictionary (1765), and by Fisher, An Accurate New Spelling Dictionary and Expositor of the English Language (17732). In a small set of letters written by Ann Fisher and some unpublished draft copies of the preface to her dictionary, she defends herself against a charge of piracy in which Entick's dictionary was involved. In these documents she not only denounces the falsity of these accusations but also tackles the question of authorship/originality in the production of dictionaries. The aim of this paper is to check Fisher's line of defence by, first, comparing both dictionaries and, second, briefly revising the eighteenth-century lexicographers' practice of using an array of sources to devise their dictionaries.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1093/ijl/ecl015

We were unable to expand this article. Please try again later. If the problem continues, please contact help@ingentaconnect.com.

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$40.03 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A