Author: Kelsey, Jane

Source: Journal of International Economic Law, Volume 14, Number 4, 23 December 2011 , pp. 845-868(24)

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Abstract:

The financial services regime, comprising the General Agreement on Trade in Services and bilateral free trade and investment agreements, reflects the orthodoxy of highly liberalized and lightly regulated financial markets that has supported the ascendancy of financialization. That orthodoxy has fractured as the post-2007 global financial crisis exposed systemic instability in the financialization model and the failings of the associated regulatory regime. Yet, binding and enforceable financial services and investment agreements tie governments to that regime. Although international institutions and commentators increasingly advocate alternative strategies, such as the imposition of currency controls, governments that adopt them risk legal challenges for breaching their trade obligations. This risk is illustrated by assessing South Korea's capital controls of June 2010 against the market access, national treatment and transfers obligations, investment protections and prudential exceptions in Korea's free trade agreements with the USA and the European Union. To date, states whose firms dominate global finance have resisted high-profile calls within and outside the World Trade Organization to revisit the financial services regime. If they maintain that position, these embryonic tensions seem likely to intensify. Placing unacceptable constraints on national governments could propel the trade in financial services regime towards a crisis of legitimacy.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgr031

Publication date: 2011-12-23

More about this publication?

• The Journal of International Economic Law is dedicated to encouraging thoughtful and scholarly attention to a very broad range of subjects that concern the relation of law to international economic activity, by providing the major English language medium for publication of high-quality manuscripts relevant to the endeavours of scholars, government officials, legal professionals and others. The emphasis will be on fundamental, long-term, systemic problems and possible solutions, in the light of empirical observations and experience, as well as theoretical and multi-disciplinary approaches. It is expected, therefore, that the journal's contents will potentially influence real events and provide important critiques of policies, negotiations, or court and tribunal cases. In this manner the journal should contribute modestly to promoting peace, world welfare and enhancement of the quality of life for all peoples.

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Economics ,  Law
• By this author: Kelsey, Jane

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers