Treatment of hospitalized patients with complicated Gram-positive skin and skin structure infections: two randomized, multicentre studies of quinupristin/dalfopristin versus cefazolin, oxacillin or vancomycin
Authors: Nichols, RL1; Graham, DR2; Barriere, SL3; Rodgers, A3; Wilson, SE4; Zervos, M5; Dunn, DL6; Kreter, B3; Skin, Synercid; Structure Infection Group, Skin
Source: Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Volume 44, Number 2, August 1999 , pp. 263-273(11)
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Abstract:
Quinupristin/dalfopristin (Synercid), the first injectable streptogramin antibiotic available for the treatment of complicated Gram-positive skin and skin structure infections, was compared with standard comparators (cefazolin, oxacillin or vancomycin) in one USA and one international trial. These two randomized, open-label trials of virtually identical design enrolled a total of 893 patients (450 quinupristin/dalfopristin, 443 comparator). The majority of patients had erysipelas, traumatic wound infection or clean surgical wound infection. Staphylococcus aureus was more common in the quinupristin/dalfopristin group than in the comparator group. The clinical success rate (cure plus improvement) in the clinically evaluable population was equivalent between the two treatment groups (68.2% quinupristin/dalfopristin, 70.7% comparator; 95% CI, -1.1, 5.1) despite a shorter mean duration of treatment for quinupristin/dalfopristin patients. In the bacteriologically evaluable population, by-patient and by-pathogen bacteriological eradication rates were somewhat lower for quinupristin/dalfopristin (65.8% and 66.6%, respectively) than for the comparator regimens (72.7% and 77.7%, respectively). The lower bacteriological response rates in the quinupristin/dalfopristin group were, in part, due to a higher rate of polymicrobial infections and a higher incidence of patients classified as clinical failure, a category which included premature discontinuation of treatment because of local venous adverse events. The bacteriological eradication rate for quinupristin/dalfopristin was higher in monomicrobial infections than in polymicrobial infections (72.6% versus 63.3%, respectively), whereas the corresponding rate for the comparator regimens was lower for monomicrobial infections than polymicrobial infections (70.8% versus 83.1%). This finding was not unexpected, since the spectrum of quinupristin/dalfopristin is focused on Gram-positive pathogens and additional antibiotics to treat Gram-negative bacteria were not required per protocol. The systemic tolerability of both treatment regimens was qualitatively similar. A higher rate of drug-related venous adverse events was reported for quinupristin/dalfopristin (66.2%) than for the comparator regimen (28..4%). Premature discontinuation of study drug was primarily due to adverse clinical events for quinupristin/dalfopristin (19.1%), whereas the most common reason for discontinuation among those receiving the comparator regimens was treatment failure (11.5%). Quinupristin/dalfopristin is an effective alternative for the treatment of hospitalized patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections due to quinupristin/dalfopristin-susceptible Gram-positive organisms, including methicillin- and erythromycin-resistant S. aureus.Document Type: Research article
Affiliations: 1: Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA 2: Springfield Clinic, Springfield, IL, USA 3: Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Collegeville, PA, USA 4: University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA, USA 5: William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA 6: University of Minnesota Health Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA

Click here for Page Help