Religion, Models of, and Reality: Are We Through with Geertz?

Author: Schilbrack, Kevin

Source: Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Volume 73, Number 2, June 2005 , pp. 429-452(24)

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Key:

- Free Content

- New Content

- Subscribed Content

- Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Clifford Geertz’s influential definition of religions as providing their members with both an ethos and a worldview—in his terms, both a “model for” and “model of” reality—has of late become a neuralgic point of contention in religious studies. In particular some critics have seen his ideas of religious models of reality as biased, out-moded, or in other ways confused about the way that language refers (or does not refer) to the world. In this article, I consider two criticisms of Geertz’s project and seek to show that, despite the partial value of the criticisms, the idea of religious models of reality continues to be a legitimate and fruitful approach to what religious communities are typically up to.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1093/jaarel/lfi042

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$35.09 plus tax Refund Policy