The study of infectious intestinal disease in England: what risk factors for presentation to general practice tell us about potential for selection bias in case-control studies of reported cases of diarrhoea

Authors: C.C. Tam1; L.C. Rodrigues2; S.J. O’Brien1

Source: International Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 32, Number 1, February 2003 , pp. 99-105(7)

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Background Cases reported to national surveillance systems commonly form the sampling frame for population-based case-control studies of infectious intestinal diseases (IID). However, reported cases represent a minority of all cases in the population, differ systematically from unreported cases, and their use in case-control studies could introduce biases. Case reporting is a selective process involving multiple stages, the first of which requires presentation by a symptomatic person to the health services. Factors affecting a person’s likelihood of presentation will thus affect the characteristics of reported cases.

Methods Data from a large study of IID in England were used to investigate factors influencing presentation to a general practitioner (GP) following an episode of IID. Multivariable logistic regression was performed, comparing GP presenters with non-presenters. Explanatory variables used were illness severity, recent foreign travel and socioeconomic indicators.

Results Severe illness (OR = 12.54, 95% CI: 7.58–20.74), recent foreign travel (OR = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.39–4.14), leaving full-time education at an earlier age (OR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.22–3.50) and housing categories representing lower socioeconomic status (SES) were all independently associated with GP presentation.

Conclusions Case reporting to national surveillance is shaped by complex biological and social factors, of which illness severity appears to be the most important. Results from case-control studies comparing cases of IID identified by surveillance with population controls are likely to generalize mainly to cases severe enough to be reported. Controlling for educational and SES (mostly housing) is required.

Document Type: Original article

Affiliations: 1: Gastrointestinal Diseases Division, Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, UK. 2: Infectious Disease Epidemiology Unit, Department of Infectious & Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$40.22 plus tax

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A