Congenital anomalies in twins: a register-based study
Authors: Glinianaia, S.V.; Rankin, J.; Wright, C.
Source: Human Reproduction, Volume 23, Number 6, 21 June 2008 , pp. 1306-1311(6)
Publisher: Oxford University Press
The risk of congenital anomalies in twins is higher than in singletons, but it is less well reported in relation to chorionicity. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of congenital anomalies in twin pregnancies by chorionicity and by major subtype and compare the rates with those in singletons.
The study population included 2329 twin pregnancies (4658 twins) and 147 655 singletons delivered in the Northeast of England during 19982002. Data were obtained from the population-based Northern Multiple Pregnancy Register and Northern Congenital Abnormality Survey.
The rate of congenital anomalies in twins was 405.8 per 10 000 twins versus 238.2 per 10 000 singletons [rate ratios (RR) 1.7, 95 confidence interval (CI) 1.52.0]. In twins with known chorionicity (84.8 of all twins), the prevalence of congenital anomalies in monochorionic (MC) twins (633.6 per 10 000) was nearly twice that in dichorionic (343.7 per 10 000; RR 1.8, 95 CI 1.32.5). There was an increased rate of congenital anomalies in twin compared with singleton pregnancies for all major types of anomalies, except chromosomal abnormalities.
This study using high quality, population-based data on multiple pregnancies and congenital anomalies found that twins, particularly MC twins, have a higher risk of congenital anomalies than singletons.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 2008-06-21
- Human Reproduction features full-length, peer-reviewed papers reporting original research, clinical case histories, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues. Papers published cover the scientific and medical aspects of reproductive physiology and pathology, endocrinology, andrology, gonad function, gametogenesis, fertilization, embryo development, implantation, pregnancy, genetics, genetic diagnosis, oncology, infectious disease, surgery, contraception, infertility treatment, psychology, ethics and social issues. The highest scientific and editorial standard is maintained throughout the journal along with a rapid rate of publication.