Gynaecology. Flexible versus rigid endoscopes for outpatient hysteroscopy: a prospective randomized clinical trial

Authors: Unfried G.¹; Wieser F.¹; Albrecht A.¹; Kaider A.²; Nagele F.¹

Source: Human Reproduction, Volume 16, Number 1, January 2001 , pp. 168-171(4)

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Abstract:

To evaluate patient acceptance, optical properties and the clinical feasibility of flexible compared with rigid hysteroscopes, 142 patients undergoing outpatient hysteroscopy were included in a prospective, randomized clinical trial. The flexible hysteroscope was used in 70 patients, and the rigid instrument in 72. At different stages of the hysteroscopy the level of pain experienced by the women was assessed using a 10 cm visual analogue scale. Optical properties characterized by the parameters intrauterine visibility, hysteroscopic view and diagnostic accuracy were ranked by the surgeons using a 5-point scale (1 = excellent to 5 = insufficient), and duration of the hysteroscopy was measured. Hysteroscopy was successful in 87.5 and 100% of patients in the flexible and rigid groups respectively. With the use of rigid telescopes, discomfort at introduction and during the hysteroscopy was significantly greater (median 1.7 versus 0.7, P = 0.003; 3.1 versus 1.2, P < 0.001 respectively), but optical properties were judged to be far superior (P < 0.001 for all three comparisons) and procedure time was significantly shorter (median 70 versus 120 s, P = 0.003). In conclusion, outpatient hysteroscopy seems to be less painful when using flexible telescopes. However, rigid hysteroscopes provide superior optical qualities and permit a more rapid performance with higher success rates at much lower cost.

Keywords: flexible hysteroscope; optical properties; outpatient hysteroscopy; pain; rigid hysteroscope

Document Type: Original article

Affiliations: 1: Minimal Access Surgery Unit, Division of Gynaecologic Endocrinology & Reproductive Medicine, University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, A-1090 Vienna, and 2: Department of Medical Computer Sciences,University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria

Publication date: 2001-01-01

• Human Reproduction features full-length, peer-reviewed papers reporting original research, clinical case histories, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues. Papers published cover the scientific and medical aspects of reproductive physiology and pathology, endocrinology, andrology, gonad function, gametogenesis, fertilization, embryo development, implantation, pregnancy, genetics, genetic diagnosis, oncology, infectious disease, surgery, contraception, infertility treatment, psychology, ethics and social issues. The highest scientific and editorial standard is maintained throughout the journal along with a rapid rate of publication.

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Anatomy & Physiology ,  Obstetrics & Gynecology
• By this author: Unfried G. ;  Wieser F. ;  Albrecht A. ;  Kaider A. ;  Nagele F.

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers