The influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness

Authors: Johnston, D. J.1; Hunt, O.1; Johnston, C. D.1; Burden, D. J.1; Stevenson, M.2; Hepper, P.3

Source: European Journal of Orthodontics, Volume 27, Number 4, August 2005 , pp. 349-354(6)

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

This study investigated the influence of changing lower face vertical proportion on the attractiveness ratings scored by lay people.

Ninety-two social science students rated the attractiveness of a series of silhouettes with normal, reduced or increased lower face proportions. The random sequences of 10 images included an image with the Eastman normal lower face height relative to total face height [lower anterior face height/total anterior face height (LAFH/TAFH) of 55 per cent], and images with LAFH/TAFH increased or decreased by up to four standard deviations (SD) from the Eastman norm. All the images had a skeletal Class I antero-posterior (AP) relationship. A duplicate image in each sequence assessed repeatability. The participants scored each image using a 10 point numerical scale and also indicated whether they would seek treatment if the image was their own profile.

The profile image with normal vertical facial proportions was rated by the lay people as the most attractive. Attractiveness scores reduced as the vertical facial proportions diverged from the normal value. Images with a reduced lower face proportion were rated as significantly more attractive than the corresponding images with an increased lower face proportion. Images with a reduced lower face proportion were also significantly less likely to be judged as needing treatment than the corresponding images with an increased lower face proportion.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cji023

Affiliations: 1: Orthodontic Division, Oral Healthcare Research Centre, School of Dentistry, Queen's University, Belfast, UK, 2: Clinical Research Support Centre, Royal Hospitals, Belfast, UK, 3: School of Psychology, Queen's University, Belfast, UK

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$34.96 plus tax

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A