State Immunity and Human Rights: The Italian Supreme Court Decision on the Ferrini Case
Authors: De Sena, Pasquale1; De Vittor, Francesca2
Source: European Journal of International Law, Volume 16, Number 1, February 2005 , pp. 89-112(24)
Publisher: Oxford University Press
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content
Abstract:
In the Ferrini case the Italian Supreme Court affirmed that Germany was not entitled to sovereign immunity for serious violations of human rights carried out by German occupying forces during World War II. In order to reach this innovative conclusion, the Court widely referred to international legal arguments, such as the concept of international crimes, the principle of primacy of jus cogens norms and the notion of a strict analogy between state immunity and the ‘functional immunity’ of state officials. Based upon a systematic interpretation of the international legal order, the Court conducted a ‘balancing of values’ between the two fundamental international law principles of the sovereign equality of states and of the protection of inviolable human rights. This article explores the Court’s reasoning and its consistency with international legal theory and preceding case law with the view to verifying whether, and in which sense, the Ferrini judgment may facilitate a radical reappraisal of the relationship between human rights and the law of state immunity.Keywords: dosage regimen; pharmacodynamics; Gram-positive bacteria
Document Type: Research article
DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chi104
Affiliations: 1: Second University of Naples., 2: University of Naples and ‘Robert Schuman’ University of Strasbourg., Email: devittor@libero.it
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content
Click here for Page Help