Unilateral action in the UN system
Author: Wedgwood R.
Source: European Journal of International Law, Volume 11, Number 2, 2000 , pp. 349-359(11)
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Realization of UN Charter values has required adaptation of its procedures in the face of Cold War politics and conflicts of national self-interest. Security Council machinery has never worked quite as planned. 'Recommendations' for the use of force have substituted when Article 43 agreements were not forthcoming and direct enforcement action was unavailable. 'Abstentions' by permanent members of the Council have been counted as 'concurrences' to allow decisions to go forward. In an era with an expanded account of human rights and human security, it should not surprise us that there is an impetus to permit effective action: in humanitarian emergencies through an expanded reading of Chapter VIII, with new latitude for regional action, and in meeting the dangers of weapons of mass destruction and terrorism through a broader account of Article 51 self-defence and unilateral enforcement of standing Council resolutions.
Document Type: Original article
Affiliations: Yale University, USA
Publication date: 2000-01-01
- The European Journal of International Law is firmly established as one of the world's leading journals in its field. With its distinctive combination of theoretical and practical approaches to the issues of international law, the journal offers readers a unique opportunity to stay in touch with the latest developments in this rapidly evolving area. Each issue of the EJIL provides a forum for the exploration of the conceptual and theoretical dimensions of international law as well as for up-to-date analysis of topical issues. Additionally, it is the only journal to provide systematic coverage of the relationship between international law and the law of the European Union and its Member States.