Public Opinion Versus Public Judgment About Crime

Author: Green, David A.

Source: British Journal of Criminology, Volume 46, Number 1, January 2006 , pp. 131-154(24)

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Purchase options

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$33.35 plus tax      Refund Policy

OR

 
More about this publication?
More like this?
Content Key:
Free Content - Free
New Content - New
Open Access Content - Open Access
Subscribed Content - Subscribed
Free Trial Content - Free Trial

Abstract:

This paper builds a case for more defensible assessments of informed public opinion on crime control and penal policy. Mass-mediated portrayals of what the public want and ubiquitous self-selected opinion polls serve as common surrogates for informed public opinion. These highly suspect assessments have gained a level of credence in policy debates that is difficult to justify. Innovations like the Deliberative Poll show promise in facilitating what has been called `public judgment'—a more reliable and refined state of informed public opinion. Less ambitious remedial proposals, including the public education programmes advocated by some experts and recently embraced by the Home Office, are insufficiently bold to make a significant and lasting impact on public knowledge and attitudes.

Keywords: advertising model; advertising wear out phenomenon; pulsation advertising policy; linear programming

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azi050

Back to top

Content Key:
Free Content - Free
New Content - New
Open Access Content - Open Access
Subscribed Content - Subscribed
Free Trial Content - Free Trial
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in
Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A